Todd Starns in a Fox News Opinion piece asks this very question.
He begins:
The culture war may be lost and religious liberty might not be that far behind, according to a new survey from LifeWay Research, the research arm of the Southern Baptist Convention.
Seventy percent of senior pastors at Protestant churches say
religious liberty is on the decline in the United States, and 59 percent
of Christians believe they are losing the culture war. Eleven percent
considers that war already lost.
Some within some Christian denominations see this as a major, MAJOR problem.
It's actually long in coming. The only question I have is: what took it so long?
The
real "problem" in my estimation is not that Christians are losing the
"Culture War." There's a multitude of problems that Christians within
the U.S. have just not dealt with very well.
#1.
Complacency. For a long, long time, Christianity held a privileged
position as the religion of choice within the U.S. With that privilege
came certain "perks" among them that many were born into the church and
expected to continue to attend church. No more. As secularism has continued almost unabated, this
expectation fell by the wayside. Fewer made the commitment to worship.
For the first few generations, this wasn't much of a problem because
there were still sufficient numbers in pews. Yet, as older generations
died out, the younger folks didn't replace them. The church suddenly
could not rest upon the fact that they held a position of privilege.
You couldn't just build a church and expect people to show up. Now,
churches truly have to engage people and work at evangelism. Simply
running into someone on the street and trying to convince them to come
to worship won't work. Literal transformation of worldviews is now
necessary. Complacent churches aren't able or oftentimes willing to put
in this kind of work.
#2. The rise of the "Spiritual
but not Religious." Most folks in the U.S. still self-identify as
Christians, but a vast majority are almost non-practicing Christians.
Many are "spiritual but not religious." Many are believers in the sense
of ascribing to the belief that Jesus is a cool guy, maybe even the Son
of God, but that belief rarely leads to visible transformation in a
person's life. Such folks often say, "I don't need to worship in church
to worship God. I can do very well under a tree in the middle of the
woods." Unfortunately, the church rarely has any response to convince a
person to worship--which leads to transformation. The church rarely
has a good apologetic (outside of "churchy" language) to combat this
rampant individualism of faith.
#3. The rise of
religious pluralism. Pluralism in and of itself isn't a bad thing. A
variety of views and understandings is a welcome thing as it prevents
any one particular group from exercising evil. Mutual respect is key,
but the church hasn't handled such a thing well. It has tended to
vacillate between relativism (embracing various other religions as
simply other paths to God) and religious snobbery (people of other
faiths are completely wrong and not worth respect). Neither of these
are particularly palatable or particularly biblical. It is extremely
difficult to be comfortable enough in one's own Christian skin and still
respect others.
#4. (This one could get me in
trouble.) The Politicalization of the Faith. Yes, I am speaking about
the "Religious Right" and the "Christian Left." These two political
movements, in my estimation are deadly. They each basically assert,
"You cannot be a true Christian if you don't vote either Democrat or
Republican." They each assert their particular political party as more
"Christian" than the other. I personally believe this is not a good
thing. I personally believe such affiliations draw lines in the sand
and lead to polarization--a polarization within the pews. Both groups
seek to exercise power to influence voters and government. In their own ways, each group tries to establish God's Kingdom on earth through the passing of legislation. Last I
checked, the church sought to transform society through POWERLESSNESS,
not through power. Very bad things have happened in history when the
church sought to use power in governmental rule. The church needs
critical distance from each political party to be able to call sin for
what it is: no matter who is committing it. When affiliating with a
party, the church has lost its prophetic voice and alienated 1/2 of the
people it is called to reach.
I could list more, but in
my estimation, these things--these changes in society--have made folks
in the church anxious. Rather than deal with the change in society,
many have battened down the hatches and sought to preserve their
"turf." They declared war oftentimes using the legislative process to accomplish their goals. Last I looked, Jesus wasn't about that
kind of stuff. The only war He declared was against evil. When it came
to society and people, Jesus sought reconciliation, forgiveness, and
love--even of His enemies. He never attempted to change the laws of the Roman empire, but sought to change the hearts and minds of those whom He came into contact with through compassion. With one caveat--He was quite vociferous toward those of the religious establishment who should have known better.
The church in America would do well to drop this pretense of culture war and follow the example of its founder.
A Lutheran preacher in rural Texas examines the Christian faith and life in general.
Showing posts with label Christ and Culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christ and Culture. Show all posts
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
And Onto Polygamy
Imagine seeing this article from CNN just a decade or two ago. Bet you wouldn't have seen it. Or thought of it. This stuff used to be on the extreme fringes of society, but now, it's making opinion headlines.
And it is little wonder.
Ethics in our nation has made a monumental shift over the years. I have argued (based on the work of Richard Neuhaus) that our nation's great experiment was to have our laws founded on Judeo-Christian principles without establishing Christianity as the formal, national religion. There were numerous reasons for this, and I will not go into those again.
What has progressively happened is a tectonic shift away from those Judeo-Christian principles and an ethics based in science/reason.
I personally am not worried about this shift in our nation. The Church in all of its expressions has existed and even thrived in cultures which were hostile to it. And our nation is far from hostile to religious expression. It just no longer bases much of its moral law upon it.
Once gay marriage would have been unheard of. Now, several states allow it, and the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act.
Polygamy is next on that slope. Strictly adhering to the Constitution, I see nothing that can prevent polygamy laws from being struck down. Consenting adults are basically allowed to do as they please.
Now, before anyone starts saying, "Polygamy isn't Christian." Please, take a look at your Bible. Polygamy is never outlawed in Scripture. There is only one prohibition against it, and that is only for a bishop of the Church. In fact, some of the greatest pillars of the faith in the Old Testament practiced polygamy in some form or another: Abraham, Jacob, and David to name a few. In each case, polygamous relationships led to some pretty unhealthy results--which is one of the reasons I do not support such a thing--but it is important to note that God remained silent about such marriages.
Christian tradition in reading Scripture and seeing the negative results of polygamous marriage has discerned God's expectation for marriage to be between one man and one woman.
In the culture which surrounds us now, I believe the Church must be a faithful witness to this in spite of the laws which change. I believe we must be ready to argue, without anger, angst, and with respect to others who share a different view, for the sanctity of the one man/one woman relationship--allowing for the brokenness of relationships and the reality of divorce; never condoning it as God's will, but offering grace and mercy. We must be ready to defend our position with much more than, "God said it should be that way, and the Bible says so too."
Remember, the Bible never condemns polygamy. If we meet someone who knows what the Bible says, we will lose the argument right then and there. It is important to know the reasons behind our teaching, and I encourage everyone to study up on the matter.
We will need to know our stuff more and more as our culture and laws become more and more secular and reason based.
And it is little wonder.
Ethics in our nation has made a monumental shift over the years. I have argued (based on the work of Richard Neuhaus) that our nation's great experiment was to have our laws founded on Judeo-Christian principles without establishing Christianity as the formal, national religion. There were numerous reasons for this, and I will not go into those again.
What has progressively happened is a tectonic shift away from those Judeo-Christian principles and an ethics based in science/reason.
I personally am not worried about this shift in our nation. The Church in all of its expressions has existed and even thrived in cultures which were hostile to it. And our nation is far from hostile to religious expression. It just no longer bases much of its moral law upon it.
Once gay marriage would have been unheard of. Now, several states allow it, and the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act.
Polygamy is next on that slope. Strictly adhering to the Constitution, I see nothing that can prevent polygamy laws from being struck down. Consenting adults are basically allowed to do as they please.
Now, before anyone starts saying, "Polygamy isn't Christian." Please, take a look at your Bible. Polygamy is never outlawed in Scripture. There is only one prohibition against it, and that is only for a bishop of the Church. In fact, some of the greatest pillars of the faith in the Old Testament practiced polygamy in some form or another: Abraham, Jacob, and David to name a few. In each case, polygamous relationships led to some pretty unhealthy results--which is one of the reasons I do not support such a thing--but it is important to note that God remained silent about such marriages.
Christian tradition in reading Scripture and seeing the negative results of polygamous marriage has discerned God's expectation for marriage to be between one man and one woman.
In the culture which surrounds us now, I believe the Church must be a faithful witness to this in spite of the laws which change. I believe we must be ready to argue, without anger, angst, and with respect to others who share a different view, for the sanctity of the one man/one woman relationship--allowing for the brokenness of relationships and the reality of divorce; never condoning it as God's will, but offering grace and mercy. We must be ready to defend our position with much more than, "God said it should be that way, and the Bible says so too."
Remember, the Bible never condemns polygamy. If we meet someone who knows what the Bible says, we will lose the argument right then and there. It is important to know the reasons behind our teaching, and I encourage everyone to study up on the matter.
We will need to know our stuff more and more as our culture and laws become more and more secular and reason based.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)