Because of Facebook, I was exposed to
this blog post by Marcus Borg. The content is disturbing on more than one level, not the least of which is the
heresy of Arianism which he openly preaches. It is also disturbing because there are many within my denomination who follow Dr. Borg ideologically and embrace his teaching as the doctrine to which the church should preach and teach.
Dr. Borg is an intelligent man. He is well read and well versed in many things, but he is completely and utterly wrong in making many of his assertions in his attempt to make Christianity relevant (dare I say palatable) to a particular group of people.
Let's simply take the following assertion from his blog post:
1. Was Jesus God? No. Not even the New Testament says that. It speaks
of him as the Word of God, the Son of God, the Messiah, and so forth,
but never simply identifies him with or equates him with God. As John’s
gospel puts it, he is the Word become flesh – that is, he reveals what
can be seen of God in a finite human life. To say, “I believe Jesus was
God” (as some Christians do, or think they are supposed to) goes beyond
what the New Testament affirms and is thus more than biblical. He is
the Word incarnate – not the disembodied Word.
Borg would do well to remember Christianity's assertion that Jesus is the God made flesh--God incarnate, but that's not his assertion. Borg's assertion is that the New Testament does not speak of Jesus as God. He is absolutely wrong on this point. Absolutely wrong, and I go beyond the statements in the Gospel of John to state my case.
Let's take look at the book of Matthew as a frame of reference. Most biblical scholars assert that Matthew was written by a Jewish-Christian for a Jewish-Christian audience. This is important. Why?
Oxford scholar Richard Bauckham has argued rather thoroughly and decisively in Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament's Christology of Divine Identity that there was no middle ground for people of the Jewish faith. God was God. People were people. There were no stages of holiness. To worship anything or anyone other than God--the I am--was blasphemy and idolatry. There are no instances, and I mean no instances of the worship of any intermediaries or "god like" people or objects. Yet, the gospel writer Matthew includes three snippets:
And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, ‘Truly you are the Son of God.’ --Matthew 14:33
Suddenly Jesus met them and said, ‘Greetings!’ And they came to him, took hold of his feet, and worshiped him. --Matthew 28:9
When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. --Matthew 28:17
Remember, Jews absolutely, positively did not worship anyone or anything other than God. Yet, they were worshiping Jesus. Conclusion: Jesus is being shown unequivocally by Matthew to be God.
Yet, it doesn't stop there. Matthew doubles down on the notion that Jesus is God on the Sermon on the Mount. This is found in Matthew chapters 5 through 7. There is a repetitive phrase spoken by Jesus over and over and over, "You have heard it said...but I say to you..."
Every time Jesus says, "You have heard it said..." He refers to Old Testament Law. And who gave the Old Testament Law--according to Jewish tradition? Don't think Moses. Moses merely conveyed the Law which was given to Him by...God. God spoke the Law. God was the initiator of the Law, and Jesus has the audacity to say "You have heard it said...BUT I say to you..." Jesus is giving Himself quite the high place, don't you think? He is daring to place His teachings above God's teachings. Any Jew would have walked away from Him in a heart beat because He dared to do this--unless that Jew believed Jesus to be God--the God made flesh--the God incarnate.
It is vitally important to recognize that Jesus was God--and is testified as God throughout the New Testament. Grace only works if Jesus is God. For the doctrine of grace states that God reconciled the world unto Himself through the Son. No human being could reconcile the world unto God--only God could.
But the reading and listening to Borg that I have done does not center on this act of reconciliation. Borg is consumed by what Christians are supposed to do. For Borg, Christianity is not focused on what God has done, but is focused on what we do. For Borg, it's all about our actions, not about grace.
It is not surprising considering his particular bias, but what is surprising, at least in my estimation, is how many folks embrace what Borg teaches when it is contrary to the New Testament, to most Christian Scholarship, and to the entire, orthodox tradition of Christianity. He is even lifted up and advertized in my own denomination as someone cutting edge and well worth reading. *Sigh.*
How is it possible that a scholar who preaches false doctrine is held in such esteem? When you figure that one out, please let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment